Renewables to counteract power plant problems during heatwave

With record temperatures being reached across the continent this summer, power plants have needed the intervention of renewables to compensate for serious shutdowns and curtailments over the summer months, WindEurope informs.

Europe’s summer heatwave has had a significant impact on power plants, with nuclear and coal plants either reducing their output or closing down temporarily. This is not the first time this has happened: heatwaves forced nuclear shutdowns or curtailments across Europe in 2003, 2006, and 2015.

But it raises two questions: why do higher temperatures lead to such large-scale shutdowns? And what can renewables do to plug the gap this creates?

 

Why do heatwaves lead to shutdowns?

Thermal power plants rely on water to function properly. And when heatwaves increase water temperatures across the continent, this has a knock-on impact on all power plants that use water in their processes.

Nuclear and coal plants use high-temperature steam to turn their turbines, converting heat energy into electricity. But in this process, the temperature of the steam falls, which prevents it from efficiently moving the turbine any further. To overcome this, the steam first needs to be condensed into water, because liquids absorb heat better than gases. And this is where the natural environment comes in. The condensation of steam into water in power plants is achieved by using cooling water drawn from rivers, lakes, or seas. This cooling water is then discharged at a temperature that is safe for wildlife in those waters. Similarly, when nuclear plants use water from rivers to cool down their reactors, they must send that water back into the rivers.

This is where the temperature increase has an impact: if the rivers from which power plants draw their cooling water heat up to more than 28°C, the plants are not permitted to empty the warm water back into the river. To do so would be to further heat up the river and seriously endanger wildlife. There have been cases in Germany where power plant operators have received temporary exemptions to enable them to keep their plants running – but this has come at a severe environmental cost, leading to at least one mass fish die-off.

To prevent such environmental catastrophes across Europe, there have been significant curtailments and temporary shutdowns:

• Nuclear plants in Finland, Germany, and Switzerland have cut back the amount of power they produce;
• EDF have temporarily shut down four nuclear reactors this summer: Fessenheim in eastern France plus 3 others near the Rhine and Rhône;
• The Grohnde and Brokdorf nuclear power plants in northern Germany have had to reduce their output;
• EnBW had to shut down a hard coal-fired power plant in Karlsruhe because of increased water temperatures;
• RWE gas plants in Dormagen and Lingen have temporarily reduced their output;
• Vattenfall also had to temporarily shut down at least one nuclear reactor in Ringhals for a couple of days due to too high cooling water temperatures at sea.

 

Re-thinking Europe’s power supply

Renewable energy sources have stepped into the breach. Solar power generation is hitting record highs, particularly in the east of Germany, although extreme heat also lowers the panels’ performance slightly. Germany’s predominantly pumped hydro stations are also currently unaffected by the heat wave. Vattenfall and Uniper have maintained stable performance from the 5 of the 7 GW of installed hydro power capacity in Germany they operate.

Looking forward, battery storage facilities could play an increasingly important role in a future energy system; they can cope with long-term heat because they have air conditioning systems to maintain a constant temperature.

In terms of affordability, wind energy is the clear leader in most parts of Europe. And thanks to technological and market innovations, wind energy is set to get cheaper in the years to come.